r/Damnthatsinteresting
•
u/FridayCicero702
•
Feb 06 '23
•
1
1
Family in 1892 posing with an old sequoia tree nicknamed "Mark Twain" - A team of two men spent 13 days sawing away at it in the Pacific Northwest - It once stood at 331 feet tall with a diameter of 52 feet - The tree was 1,341 years old Image
3.6k
u/ZeroZeta_ Feb 06 '23
The diameter was 52 feet? How tall are these people?
3.0k
u/silveroranges Feb 06 '23 •
![]()
Maybe they meant circumference?
edit; if that guy on the bottom is about 6ft, then the tree diameter is roughly 16-18ft, which works out to 50-56ft circumference.
2.0k
u/steely-gar Feb 06 '23
I was told there would be NO math.
→ More replies (10)750
u/weekendrant Feb 06 '23 •
![]()
If you prefer the American units, it's 8 bald eagles sitting in a circle, touching the tips of their wings.
205
u/Tengu2069 Feb 06 '23
sniff sniff is that freedom I smell?
→ More replies (3)95
u/BlessTheKneesPart2 Feb 06 '23
Red Tail HawkBald Eagle Screeches in the distance→ More replies (1)92
u/Ink7o7 Feb 06 '23
But how many football fields
→ More replies (5)44
u/Rivendel93 Feb 06 '23
At least 2.
→ More replies (6)15
→ More replies (18)18
→ More replies (21)45
u/CosmoSplash Feb 06 '23
With a circumference of 52 feet it would take only 102 laps around to run 1 mile
33
87
36
u/BFP101214 Feb 06 '23
I think circumference haha
52/2=26. 26/3.14=8.28. Looks like the dude comes to about three quarters or so to the center, so 6ish feet sounds reasonable haha
→ More replies (6)61
u/ShutterBun Feb 06 '23
This photo is NOT the Mark Twain tree.
→ More replies (3)17
u/garlicbanana Feb 06 '23
Cool. Wiki still says 52 ft diameter which is clearly incorrect. Three guys standing atop each other doesn't add up to 50 ft lol.
→ More replies (8)37
u/Background-Pea6650 Feb 06 '23
Wondering the same thing.. someone's math is skewed..
→ More replies (2)11
→ More replies (68)24
u/cruss0129 Feb 06 '23
not only that, What kind of chode of a tree is only 6 times taller than it is wide?
→ More replies (2)
1.5k
u/ShitfacedGrizzlyBear Feb 06 '23
For any non-Americans (and honestly, Americans too) out there, I would 100% recommend visiting any of the national parks with sequoia trees if you’re ever in California on holiday. They really are breathtaking. There’s no way to really comprehend their size until you see them in person. It’s like the Grand Canyon. You’re just in awe and at a loss for words.
213
u/bubbs72 Feb 07 '23
Was there this summer, loved it!!! I felt so small in their midst. I just wish you could touch them and see a fast movie of their life. :)
→ More replies (4)52
u/ShitfacedGrizzlyBear Feb 07 '23
Really hard to comprehend that time scale. But when you see their size, it makes sense. Can’t imagine trees getting that big in fewer than 1,000 years.
44
u/GuiltyGecko Feb 07 '23
Putting the Sequoia in terms of the Grand Canyon really puts it into perspective for me. When I first saw the Grand Canyon, all I could think was "There's no photo that can truly capture the sheer scale of this place." As someone who has never seen a Sequoia tree, I imagine it must be a similar experience.
→ More replies (2)16
u/iamblankenstein Feb 07 '23
i live in CA and have visited a number of times and it never gets old. it's sad that so many were cut down.
→ More replies (36)10
u/classic66mustang Feb 07 '23
Avenue of the giants is the most amazing road you will ever drive. Every turn has the biggest tree you have ever seen in your life followed by a turn with yet a bigger tree.
6.3k
u/JDioon
Feb 06 '23
•
Allegedly, they made giant tables out of this for bad guys to sit around and be all bad and stuff
717
u/Meatyglobs Feb 06 '23
And they twirled their mustaches and said things like, “meeah…”
→ More replies (3)92
u/Rain_Fall95 Feb 06 '23
"My sinister plot has finally come to fruition! Now, what to do about that meddling detective...."
→ More replies (2)1.1k
u/CommercialAddress168 Feb 06 '23
Thank you for making me catch a little smile and chuckle. This picture saddens me every time I see it because I think of this and all the other amazing trees we lost during this time.
406
u/Hopie73 Feb 06 '23
Me too, breaks my heart seeing this magnificent tree laying dead. Over 1,000 years old, gone.
→ More replies (16)172
u/sdaidiwts Feb 06 '23
Don't worry, we are still chopping down really old trees for toilet paper.
113
u/rethinkingat59 Feb 07 '23
Most toilet paper aren’t old trees.
Southern yellow pine makes most of our toilet paper in the us. It goes to pulpwood as you thin to optimize pine lumber forests in about 15 years. A bit of 50-100 year old thinned Douglas fir is often added to the pulp mix for higher quality paper. These are crop forests, little different than corn.
→ More replies (6)52
40
→ More replies (17)33
u/ask_johnny_mac Feb 06 '23
Nonsense. The vast majority of lumber and paper is sourced from tree plantations today.
→ More replies (2)69
u/dgrant92 Feb 06 '23
Its like there's this "All The Pretty Things Must Die Club"
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (44)45
u/Old_Laugh_2386 Feb 06 '23
Yes. Yes, me too. I hate seeing this tremendous trees cut down. Just sad.
380
Feb 06 '23
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (11)60
Feb 06 '23
[deleted]
→ More replies (1)19
u/SaltyMudpuppy Feb 06 '23
Maybe, but that's not who you responded to. Broken bot.
12
u/SpambotSwatter Expert Feb 06 '23
True, I haven't had a click farmer in my queue for a while I need to update the phrasing when it hijacks the parent
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (41)32
u/ilovekerma Feb 06 '23
If that tree is 52' in diameter, that guy is 10' tall.
→ More replies (3)36
u/NavierStoked981 Feb 06 '23
It’s gotta be a mistake and they meant circumference. Diameter of about 3 guys tall is ~18 ft times 3 is 54 ft
→ More replies (2)
1.3k
u/CreditOk6077 Feb 06 '23
I don't think you know what diameter means...
260
26
22
u/ukdarla Feb 06 '23
I thought this, and then thought that maybe they meant circumference, but can’t edit it as it’s a title?
20
→ More replies (9)9
u/5ozbird1lbcoconut Feb 06 '23
You keep using this word. I don’t think it means what you think it means.
2.3k
u/AskJeeves84
Feb 06 '23
•
Shameful the tree didn’t make it to 1342 years, and beyond.
1.2k
u/LuvliLeah13 Feb 06 '23
I know. Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should.
305
u/i_suck_at_squad Feb 06 '23
Just because some one will pay you doesn’t mean you should…
→ More replies (3)76
Feb 06 '23
Well, hold on now...
91
→ More replies (4)125
u/Mettsico Feb 06 '23
Exactly. These guys are assholes, and this is coming from a woodworker.
→ More replies (10)20
u/DenkJu Feb 07 '23
It always makes me sad to see something like this. This tree stood for 1341 years. It has seen cultures rise and collapse. Probably survived dozens of natural disasters and thousands of storms. Humans killed it in a few days just for its wood.
→ More replies (27)344
u/peregrinkm Feb 06 '23
Yeah, why do humans have this obsession with destroying everything that’s naturally great?
→ More replies (33)103
u/Youngadvisor12 Feb 06 '23
Because resources
This was the late 1800s very different mindset, industrialization was just starting.
→ More replies (33)105
u/Strafe25 Feb 06 '23
I think I’ve been to the massive stump of this particular tree in Big Trees. From what I was told by a park ranger/volunteer a lot of these super giant trees weren’t much use as lumber as they were so tall/heavy that when they fell a lot them essentially “shattered” into a bunch of smaller chunks that weren’t all that useful.
The taking down of these mega trees seemed to actually have been more of a “can we?” than a desperate need for lumber. It was also a lot more difficult to fell them. Sounds like these it/they weren’t really worth felling from a time/resources/economic standpoint.
→ More replies (8)47
u/KorewaRise Feb 07 '23
did some googling, at first it was to really clear space and than they realized they could make mad profits by selling them to museums, world fairs and rich folk. from 1800-1900 70% of all north Americas giant trees and old growth forest were cut, today only about 10% of old growth and giants remain
https://www.notesfromthefrontier.com/post/they-were-giants-america-s-lost-forests
→ More replies (3)
574
u/furious_sauce Feb 06 '23
I'm vigilante planting giant sequoia seedlings around western WA as we speak
75
u/monitorsareprison Feb 06 '23
ive been wanting to plant a tree seed that will eventually grow very high. but not sure what tree seed would be best to plant.
i wanna plant one in my local forest. think it would be cool to watch it grow and see it in 50 years knowing i planted it would be epic. dunno why lol.
UK climate.
hit me with suggestions!
28
u/InevitableRhubarb232 Feb 07 '23
Plant something local that is already in the forest. Don’t bring in something non native
→ More replies (8)23
188
u/peu-peu Feb 06 '23 edited Feb 06 '23
You're planting Giant Sequoia that far out of its narrow range, the western slope of the Sierra Nevada mountains in California? Could you be planting something more appropriate, like redwood or maybe trees native to your area?
Edit: I don't want to forget to say, I support your guerilla actions! It seems there are examples of successfully introduced Giant Sequoias in WA.
114
u/booty_fewbacca Feb 06 '23
You're planting Giant Sequoia that far out of its narrow range, the western slope of the Sierra Nevada mountains in California?
At this time of year? At this part of the day? In this part of the country? Localized entirely within your kitchen?
→ More replies (3)21
u/zakiechan2 Feb 06 '23
They grow perfect up here in western Wa. They are everywhere and awesome to see. There is one in Tacoma that is literally smashed between the road and sidewalk that is 100 ft tall at least on a random street downtown 🤣 Very popular to grow here
→ More replies (4)21
u/furious_sauce Feb 06 '23
Could I be planting something more appropriate? Probably, but this is a thing that makes me happy. Yes, there are already Sequoias here, many of them already large and thriving.
It makes me happy to think that in a century these little guys will be giants
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (7)46
u/Pixielo Feb 06 '23
Climate change will give them the optimal growth range within a few decades, have no fear.
→ More replies (3)35
u/furious_sauce Feb 06 '23
TBH that was part of my rationale; what if CA becomes hostile range for Sequoias? Well I'mma sprinkle a bunch of these around here now so that maybe in a hundred years they'll have their own California climate here.
Also they're a hedge on climate change in a different way: they're more drought-tolerant than, say, other large species in Western WA like the Red Cedar and Douglas Fir.
→ More replies (6)70
u/OpossumOnomatopoeia Feb 06 '23
No need, they were planted like crazy in the 1900s. You can see them all over Seattle.
62
→ More replies (14)7
u/D4nM4rL4r Feb 06 '23
In the early 80s on a family trip, brought back 25 Redwood saplings to GA. Only 1 survived and is planted in the front yard. Only about 30ish feet tall some 40 years later. Now I'm sad thinking that after I sell the house, eventually someone will cut it down cuz they don't like it or something.
→ More replies (2)
634
u/czechman45 Feb 06 '23
🎵How high does the sycamore grow? If you cut it down, you can measure it! 🎵
106
u/EboniSimmer Feb 06 '23
Now off to Disney+ to watch Pocahontas 😂
→ More replies (5)18
u/Carpaltunnelsnake Feb 07 '23
Can you chop down all of the colors of the wiiiiiiiiind?
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (9)25
u/tratemusic Feb 06 '23
Have you EVER HEARD THE WOLF CRY TO THE BLUUUUUE COOOORN MOOOOOOON
→ More replies (4)
2.6k
u/pigsgetfathogsdie Feb 06 '23
Context:
2023: A really evil/stupid thing to do.
1892: A totally normal thing to do…they literally thought natural resources were infinite.
969
u/Odd_Entertainment629 Feb 06 '23
technically trees are, it gon be a whiiiile before we get a tree like that one back, tho 🥲7
→ More replies (17)622
u/pigsgetfathogsdie Feb 06 '23
Totally agree…these big trees are sacred…but, this is a 2023 perspective.
Back in 1892…they took everything possible from nature…for survival…and assumed it was an infinite supply.
293
u/VladimolfPoetler Feb 06 '23
Makes you think how we will be looked back on, in about 130ish years.....
→ More replies (60)347
u/pigsgetfathogsdie Feb 06 '23
Prolly gonna look at us like environmental killers.
21
u/Youngadvisor12 Feb 06 '23
I think you folks underestimate the effects of bad education, as well as how theres less than 2 dozen first world countries compared to hundreds of third world countries. Those factors play a huge role on how the world will look like 130 years from now, if it continues on this course…
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (19)156
u/Better-Director-5383 Feb 06 '23
I was gon a say these guys cut down a tree and look how we're treating them meanwhile were in the middle of a mass extinction event caused in large part by our actions since this picture.
In other words, not fondly.
→ More replies (20)10
u/Odd_Entertainment629 Feb 06 '23
granted I'm not an expert on trees and the cutting thereof, but isn't it just so much more work to cut a massive tree like this?
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (59)42
u/IBM_0009 Feb 06 '23
I definitely don’t think people back then assumed things in nature were in infinite supply. Actually, I’d argue they were so aware of it that it probably lead humans to start farming and domesticating animals.
→ More replies (2)12
u/Dragoness42 Feb 06 '23
It's one thing to know resources aren't infinite, and quite another thing to get people to act like it and actually value a tree like this alive. So many people in those days saw everything big and powerful in nature as a challenge to be conquered.
232
u/DTabris Feb 06 '23 edited Feb 06 '23
Maybe in 1792 people in the west thought nature was infinite (but even then not so much).
By 1892 people knew about extinction and environmental burnout. Travelogues, scientific voyage lit, and forestry/whaling documents from the time all mention the increasing scarcity of resources. Usually it was the whalers and lumberjacks who pushed for some governmental regulations, at that time
Edit: corrected typo, whales to whalers
→ More replies (15)67
u/BiggusDickus- Feb 06 '23
They understood that natural resources were finite. They just didn’t care.
It’s not like we aren’t still doing the same thing today.
→ More replies (3)60
u/Witty-Vixen Feb 06 '23 edited Feb 07 '23
Whether they believe was or wasn’t, they still knew back then that trees don’t grow that fast and that such a tree had to be very old.
→ More replies (7)20
Feb 06 '23
Lets just say that a thousand years old tree is HARD to replace, now and a century ago.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (105)20
u/Curious_Attempt4080 Feb 06 '23
I think the point isn’t that these were evil individuals sitting around cackling at their misdeeds—they weren’t—but rather that this demonstrates why these ancient, giant sequoias need to be protected by law.
→ More replies (1)
197
u/Electrical_Tip352 Feb 06 '23
This is the area I’m from. You can still see all the scars left from clear cutting before environmental laws about were passed up there. They do selection cutting now so not as big of an impact but they just went at it for a long time before they couldn’t. There are also company logging towns. One is called Scotia and I used to live there. So weird.
→ More replies (8)24
u/Unyxxxis Feb 07 '23
I often go hiking around here on the private timber lands. Its a shame to be walking through, say, an old logging area with only 50 y/o spruce trees only to realize that beneath all those trees are massive redwood stumps cut a hundred years ago and completely covered over...
→ More replies (1)
82
u/liquidio Feb 06 '23
So they spent 13 days cutting it down.
Then they came back on day 14 and had to start cutting it into sections…
→ More replies (5)
75
u/CaptainBayouBilly Feb 07 '23
Some humans have a strange obsession with finding the oldest, the biggest, the fastest, the most of whatever category it is and making a name by killing it.
196
u/MisterOphiuchus Feb 06 '23
Bro how fucking cool would it be to just carve out the middle and make it into a house, not like planks or anything, just a hollow tree.
→ More replies (12)51
u/Coyoteatemybowtie Feb 06 '23
You can see some of those on display in the redwoods, nothing this massive but same concept
→ More replies (1)
225
u/MrSKiG88UK Feb 06 '23
I’m not a hippie but that tree had more right to be there than most people
→ More replies (12)
114
u/BillyBobRio Feb 06 '23
Sequoia trees are found in California not the Pacific Northwest. They tried for years to harvest them but when the trees dropped, they shattered. There is an area in Sequoia National Park called big stump where you can see many huge stumps leftover from the logging efforts.
50
u/3mmyjo Feb 06 '23
Specifically you can see the stump of this tree in kings canyon national Park which is why I was so confused when it said Pacific Northwest. This tree went on to be used to show the natural wonder of California. They took the bark of it if I remember correctly to New York and then to England and it was part of the reason that sequoias became protected. So like it sucked that this tree was cut down but then it went on to save the rest of this aquarius so it's bittersweet.
→ More replies (1)16
u/Horror-Childhood6121 Feb 06 '23
There are coast redwoods and then there are giant sequoias. They grow in very different climates
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (16)21
339
u/TheFluffyDovah Feb 06 '23
And they cut this magnificent tree because? What did they use wood for?
264
u/TheGentleman717 Feb 06 '23
Toothpicks and matchsticks. The wood is terrible to be used for anything.
These giant trees are protected now. I believe the exact location of the tallest tree in the world is kept secret from the general public
69
u/Necessary_Essay2661 Feb 06 '23
Hyperion in the california redwood forest, it's true its exact location is secret, but i'm sure other redwoods are close or at least comparable in height, could probably only really tell if you were above the redwoods on a helicopter or something
25
u/wrldruler21 Feb 06 '23
It was only discovered in 2006. Probably because the trees nearby were of similar giant height and it took some science to calculate the precise height.
→ More replies (3)24
u/markevens Feb 06 '23 edited Feb 07 '23
Last I heard, Hyperion lost a snag and is no longer the tallest.
The new tallest tree is known but is not being released.
Also, Hyperion's location has been leaked and is getting a lot of foot traffic now.
All the traffic brought trash and shit and is fucking up the tree, so being within a mile of it will get you a hefty fine and possibly jail time.
23
u/Necessary_Essay2661 Feb 06 '23
Damn i didn't know that. I've never been to the redwoods but i feel like if you've seen a tree that's 360 feet high, not a lot more is gained from seeing a tree thats 380 feet high, they're all impressive as fuck
11
u/markevens Feb 07 '23 edited Feb 07 '23
Moreover, a single tree is nothing compared to a grove, and Hyperion stands alone.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (12)115
u/dohtella Feb 06 '23 edited Feb 06 '23
Kept secret? All you have to do is look out and the tallest tree is the tallest tree. You can’t keep that a secret.
/s
→ More replies (10)14
u/RoonSwanson86 Feb 06 '23
I just looked out my window and the tallest tree in the world is about 50 ft tall. I will not accept any other answer
→ More replies (1)31
u/Frozenwood1776 Feb 06 '23
Believe it or not, just one bowling pin was made out of that tree. Source? Simpsons.
→ More replies (4)62
14
→ More replies (31)38
u/Azzkrackin Feb 06 '23
Firewood
30
u/Rose8918 Feb 06 '23
Redwood and sequoia is terrible at burning. If anything they used it for construction materials.
→ More replies (16)
129
u/devilgoof Feb 06 '23
This is sad to me. The tree probably had a lot more time left.
→ More replies (1)39
58
u/TrumpCheats Feb 07 '23
1,300 years taken away in 13 days. People view the 13 days work as something in which to feel pride over rather than shame.
→ More replies (2)
43
57
u/PowerWagon106 Feb 06 '23
Sorry, Central CA is not the PNW. Cool tree though...
→ More replies (24)
58
22
56
21
u/bigburgerboy92 Feb 06 '23
Would’ve been a lot cooler if they left it alone, but here we are, humans being dumb again for pointless reasons other than “if we can, we do.”
19
7
8
7.6k
u/lpcuut Feb 06 '23
You can see part of the tree in the Museum of Natural History, NYC. The diameter is amazing.