r/PublicFreakout • u/ImYourRealDadHey • Jan 24 '23

2 lady’s flipping a guys car after he burnt the Quran Repost 😔

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

50.1k Upvotes

86% Upvoted

12.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2.6k

u/saltyeleven Jan 25 '23

Me too! Kind of disappointed now.

91

u/[deleted] Jan 25 '23 edited Jan 25 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

145

u/PantherThing Jan 25 '23

filming their license plates and posting this was the smartest thing we've ever done!!

251

u/SarpedonWasFramed Jan 25 '23

Imagine thinking that when you get to heaven God going to thank you for trying to kill another human over a book.

Like Mohamed is going to meet you at the gates and walk you up to God "Hey God this is the lady I was telling you about, you know the one who avenged your book being burned."

356

u/[deleted] Jan 25 '23 edited Jan 25 '23

[deleted]

101

u/AlexTheFormerTeacher Jan 25 '23

You would have to twist yourself into knots to say you follow the Quran but also believe that non Muslims should have equal rights, that women are equals or that gay people deserve to live.

Just my personal opinion, but any religion that makes you think like this about people that are different than you is utter shit.

9

u/GockCobbler333 Jan 25 '23

Any ideology in general.

5

u/Basedrum777 Jan 25 '23

Welcome to all abrahamic religions....

80

u/tazbaron1981 Jan 25 '23

It also states in Islam that the more you suffer for your religion, the greater your reward will be. Clearly didn't read that part

12

u/[deleted] Jan 25 '23 edited Jan 25 '23

Really? Guess that explains a lot lol. I spent a lot of time in Afghanistan and how many men, women, and children died because of some Imam telling them this shit...sad. Too many to count. The worst part is that these people were fucked from the beginning. Their literacy rates are dumpster level so its super easy to be manipulated by someone who is supposed to be a trusted agent.

1

u/gangkom Jan 25 '23

I'm a devoted Muslim and this is new to me. :)

3

u/tazbaron1981 Jan 25 '23

This was told to me by a Muslim I worked with. I was talking to him as he wasn't getting a lot of comments from idiots (this was around the time of 9/11), but wasn't reacting to them. I asked him why he wasn't reacting to the comments, and that was the reason he gave.

1

u/Spanktronics Jan 25 '23

Ha, Mother Theresa’s greatest hit was a cover.

1

u/Stalysfa Jan 26 '23

Like Catholic. Yet I don’t see a lot of Catholics nowadays who follow this.

1

u/tazbaron1981 Jan 27 '23

Don't see it in a lot of religions that are supposed to practice it

53

u/Caffeinetank Jan 25 '23

Quran is the literal word of Allah, according to Muslims. There are no footnotes that say it should be taken symbolically or with context.

It’s not supposed to be interpreted any other way. My parents are liberal Muslims and don’t believe this, but can’t defend their point of view outside of some obscure hadiths. When I was a practicing Muslim, I had an imam very clearly explain this to me.

4

u/Beginning-Ratio6870 Jan 25 '23

I've met christians like that, radical anything is tough.

5

u/retarded-degen Jan 25 '23 edited Jan 25 '23

The Bible doesn’t say you should interpret it symbolically. It’s just that modern Christian’s ignore the parts of the Bible where it says being gay is a sin and should be punished with a death sentence, and so on because they realized that it’s important to fit into the western society if they want to retain any sort of relevance. Content wise the Bible is not much better. It promotes homophobia, sexism, torture, death for non believers, slavery and a whole lot of other questionable things. The Old Testament is much worse in that regard than the new testament, but both have it.

Also a lot of people exist who do take the Bible literally.

6

u/XiPoohBear2021 Jan 25 '23

Also a lot of people exist who do take the Bible literally.

Different Christian sects interpret the Bible differently. Fundamentalist Protestants, most notoriously Evangelicals like the Southern Baptists in the USA, mostly insist it's the literal word of God.

Catholics, the largest sect of Christianity, do not take the Bible literally.

2

u/TheNorthC Jan 25 '23

I agree, but there are clearly bits that were never meant to be literal, like a lot of Psalms - they are clearly prayers. And I don't expect that people believe that there was a real Prodigal Son, or a Good Samaritan. These were made up to illustrate a point. Perhaps it is real that Jesus spoke those words, but he never said that they weren't real stories.

But nowadays, mainstream Christians accept that most of the Old Testament is creation myths. The biggest surprise to me was that the key event of the Jewish faith, the exodus from Egypt is probably entirely fictional - there is no evidence of Jewish slaves in Egypt, especially not 600,000, despite the Egyptians being great record keepers. And the Israeli lands at the time were part of the Egyptian Empire.

0

u/Caffeinetank Jan 25 '23

That’s just called cherry picking. Kind of how so many “Christians” prefer not to think about the chastity before marriage. I do know some Muslim girls who used the back door loop hole, though.

2

u/BrokeAnimeAddict Jan 25 '23

The literal word of a fake being. Lol that means absolutely nothing.

8

u/Caffeinetank Jan 25 '23

I hear ya. I feel the same way. My revelation came about when I learned about Muhammad (at the behest of the imam) and was horrified at the things he did.

I knew at that point that any omnipotent being would never seen such an unsavory person to be a final messenger. If a god like that did exist, he’d send someone who would be popular despite what time period viewed him through the values of that day. Muhammad was a man of his times although there was that thing about a 9 year old bride that would make any normal man cringe at the thought.

I also began to think about how silly it was to think that a book is going to be the literal word of a god when it didn’t come down in a divine fire, but spoken from an illiterate man and only published decades after his death.

Religion is silly. Why would an omniscient being care if two people of the same gender loved each other? Why would there be so much baseless superstition rather than real knowledge (that science would later prove) if it was really communicated by a god? The world was made in 6 days? Really? That’s the literal interpretation. How anyone can believe that floors me — it leaves out the dinosaurs!

-2

u/XiPoohBear2021 Jan 25 '23

Quran is the literal word of Allah, according to Muslims

Only in Arabic.

It's fundamentalist Protestants who think the Bible is the literal word of God no matter the language.

4

u/Spanktronics Jan 25 '23 edited Jan 25 '23

Just don’t go on national tv and call it the “motherload of bad ideas” bc that makes you a right wing fascist hatemonger.

You need to be tolerant of an ideology that awards its adherents bonus points for murdering you.

4

u/Cheap_Occasion3912 Jan 25 '23

I have nothing to add; I'm just commenting to pin this since you've summarized years' worth of arguments I've had in my college days.

Thank you, kind sir :)

3

u/GrindcoreNinja Jan 25 '23

I fear for Europe democracies when the mass migration from the middle east happens due to the area being unlivable.

9

u/Marketing_Analcyst Jan 25 '23

Was born into a Muslim family. Read the Quran when I was in High School and left the religion.

2

u/WillistheWillow Jan 25 '23

Nonsense. The bible is full of all sorts of horrible, extremist shit as well. It's a matter of how much people choose to ignore the horrible shit. The MAGA fraternity use the Bible to justify all sorts of horrible shit.

2

u/TheNorthC Jan 25 '23

The Qur'an is pretty short, when you strip out the repetition especially, but also mind-numbingly dull. But to boil it down into the shortest TLDR version:

  • Praise Allah
  • Those who praise will be blessed
  • Those who don't praise Allah will be punished
  • Repeat

6

u/jspangles313 Jan 25 '23

Do you think there's a way that can really be done?

-36

u/moosaev Jan 25 '23

He’s full of shit. The Quran is very nuanced, and there are academics that dedicate their lives to interpreting the meaning of each verse. Fatwas describing rulings can be hundreds of pages long. This would hardly be necessary for a “straight forward” book. This dude is either a) Coptic Christian and hates Muslims and islam and is making up lies or b) an ex Muslim who has made being anti Islam his entire personality, they are their own archetype.

54

u/bleach710 Jan 25 '23

Okay there’s a simple way to prove it, say that you are Muslim you believe non-Muslims are equal, women are equal and you believe gay people have the right to live

21

u/chapinbird Jan 25 '23

....he probably just hasn't seen this reply yet, right guys?

.....guys......?

-13

u/tartoran Jan 25 '23

the comment youre replying to is less than 2 hours old, and your comment is only nearly half an hour old at the time of me posting this comment, meaning you left it when it was less than 90 mins old. i have no horse in this race but holy shit realize not everyone is as autistically devoted to this site as you

22

u/khaarde Jan 25 '23

The commenter in question has replied to several other comments shortly after you posted this, just so you know.

The question has clearly been avoided.

3

u/EnigmaticQuote Jan 25 '23

It’s ok man calm down

→ More replies (0)

13

u/Bageezax Jan 25 '23

And that it's OK, even if he doesn't personally like it, to insult the prophet, burn the Quran, not wear hijab or niqab, or draw cartoons of Muhammad.

4

u/TimeBrilliant9213 Jan 25 '23

Damn, he never responded!!

4

u/bleach710 Jan 25 '23

They never do

27

u/BluePandaCafe94-6 Jan 25 '23 edited Jan 25 '23

So Islam has no flaws and can't be criticized? Anyone who criticizes Islam is a bigot who doesn't understand, or an ex-Muslim whose just lost in their own delusions?

Methinks you doth protest too much.

God is not great, nor is he real, and there are many lessons in the Quran that are truly horrible at face value.

What does the Quran recommend as punishment for those who leave Islam?

and there are academics that dedicate their lives to interpreting the meaning of each verse. Fatwas describing rulings can be hundreds of pages long.

Yes, this is called theological apologism, and it's an extraordinarily dishonest and self-serving branch of philosophy. Every fundamentalist and radical of every religion tries their hand at apologism, to make their ridiculous holy textbook seem less insane to normal people not obsessed with fictional superheroes. "Academics" is a stretch.

15

u/Bageezax Jan 25 '23

An academic degree in religion is like having a PhD in warp core physics.

5

u/Snarfbuckle Jan 25 '23

As an Atheist i have to (partially) disagree.

Theologists study religions(s) to understand the actual meaning of texts and translations so that people (hopefully) do not take things to literally since there are a lot of nuances in translations and meanings in texts that are lost over time and put things into the correct context.

One egregious example from the newer translations of the bible for example is the part about homosexuals that they should be put to death is actually not about being gay, it was actually aimed against pederasts and pedophiles since the practice at the time the Leviticus spoke about it there were "traditions" in some societies to fuck young boys and rape children.

If people did NOT try to understand ancient texts people tend to bind their lives around it could be waay worse...like the nutbag evangelicals in the US for example.

1

u/Bageezax Jan 25 '23

Not saying that it is worthless, only that it is the equivalent of a lit degree...interesting, but has little to do with the real world.

→ More replies (0)

-19

u/moosaev Jan 25 '23

Who said anything about PHD? You’re projecting your own western bias on what I said, there are academics in the Muslim world who spend their whole lives studying the Quran, only for Reddit trolls to dispense wisdom about Islam from their mom’s basement. Go out and touch some grass, this anti religion schtick is very 2013, it’s 2023.

11

u/Bageezax Jan 25 '23

I'm telling you that there are people who study the works of Tolkien their whole lives, writing for hundreds of pages of analysis and commentary, and none of that makes Morgoth real. This basic logical construct was true in 1413, 2013, and 2023 and beyond.

Logic doesn't get less logical with age. Also, my mom is dead, and I own my own house, so take your infantile assumptions elsewhere.

What you're doing is saying that there's people that waste their lives reading one book over and over, and this somehow makes what they think about it more important than basic logic. It doesn't. It makes them into charlatans endlessly avoiding the main problem: there is zero evidence that the things in the Quran (or Torah, or bible) are true except for some geography of the time. The rest is tall tales and frippery disguised as scholarship.

21

u/BluePandaCafe94-6 Jan 25 '23 edited Jan 25 '23

People who just read a holy textbook their whole lives and nothing else, are not "academics".

You're not an "academic" if the only intellectual activity you engage in is self-serving sophistry and mental gymnastics to defend your predetermined conclusions / religious beliefs.

only for Reddit trolls to dispense wisdom about Islam from their mom’s basement.

What a pathetic strawman. I'm a biologist (an actual academic, FYI), and everyone I know in academia with a functional brain has rejected religious modes of thinking.

Go out and touch some grass, this anti religion schtick is very 2013, it’s 2023.

LOL guys I guess that whole "secularism" "science" "skepticism" thing is just a fad. Nowadays we ignore scientific evidence and insist on religious nonsense. That's what the cool kids do! LMAO I can't imagine anyone actually saying this seriously. What a dumbass.

You don't seem to realize how fucking ridiculous you sound.

1

u/jspangles313 Jan 25 '23

Fuck that, anti religion is hot today.

→ More replies (0)

-15

u/moosaev Jan 25 '23 edited Jan 25 '23

Of course he can criticize islam, but when the criticisms are clearly disingenuous (which they are) then you have to question his motives. He said something that is factually untrue (that the Quran is a simple straightforward book with no room for interpretation). That’s patently false. It’s ok to be anti religion or anti Islam, but is there no standard for integrity? Is it ok to blatantly lie?

12

u/smolpp12345 Jan 25 '23

He said something that is factually untrue (that the Quran is a simple straightforward book with no room for interpretation). That’s patently false

lol isn't that a claim made in the quran?

13

u/BluePandaCafe94-6 Jan 25 '23

It's also a claim made by countless Imams and Muftis.

This guy is literally engaging in sophistry right now by opportunistically arguing otherwise.

→ More replies (0)

17

u/BluePandaCafe94-6 Jan 25 '23

Those criticisms don't seem disingenuous.

I've seen similar criticisms made by hundreds of former Muslims, including former radical jihadist Maajid Nawaz.

It also tracks with real world Islamic politics, where factions seem to be based around which of Muhammads relatives and followers are a legitimate successor, and not so much on Muhammad himself or his words.

It doesn't help that Islamic politics the world over is extremely conservative, so more liberal interpretations are stomped out with violence. There's a reason why the most liberal Muslims on the planet live in America, where there's two oceans between them and the fundamentalists in Iran and Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

-5

u/moosaev Jan 25 '23

Just because others make that same criticism it does not mean it isn’t disingenuous. Incidentally, I’ve heard maajid nawaaz’s arguments, they are the exact opposite of the argument the poster I responded to was making. Nawaaz’s argument is that Islam has a process of ijma(interpretation) that provides room for moderate interpretations, and we should be encouraging the moderates to interrupt the Quran in ways compatible with modern society. That’s literally the EXACT opposite of what the moron above was arguing.

7

u/bleach710 Jan 25 '23

I’m just asking you to say that you believe that non-Muslims should be equal to Muslims. That women should have the same rights as men and gay people may live in peace, without fear of death or violence if you can say that great if you can’t just admit and prove me right

10

u/BluePandaCafe94-6 Jan 25 '23 edited Jan 25 '23

Nawaaz’s argument is that Islam has a process of ijma(interpretation) that provides room for moderate interpretations, and we should be encouraging the moderates to interrupt the Quran in ways compatible with modern society. That’s literally the EXACT opposite of what the moron above was arguing.

Nawaz is a reformer in that sense. He's on the cutting edge of this reform movement. The fact that he's advocating for a reform movement in the first place should be evidence that the current status quo is in need of change. In fact, he's stated that the need for change is so strong, precisely because the dogmatic conservative fundamentalist perspective is so ubiquitous, it has convinced even many Muslims that this is the only proper interpretation.

After all, when we look at the Islamic world from the outside, where are the moderates? I don't see any moderates in the Iranian or Saudi governments. I don't see any in Turkey's government either. Overwhelmingly, the loudest voices in Islam are the hyper-conservative traditionalists who have an utter stranglehold on the entire Islamic civilization.

I still don't think the criticisms are disingenuous, because when you look at the Islamic world, the one that all these former Muslims have escaped from, be they Nawaz, or Hirsi Ali, or this random internet guy from Egypt, you don't see any substantial moderating forces in any position of power. There are no large secular institutions in Islamic states... even Islamic universities are predominantly focused on theology, and their science departments have disproportionately low output. Like, the Egyptian government hates the Muslim Brotherhood, but not because they disagree over religious details. The Muslim Brotherhood is simply a political threat to the power of the Egyptian military. There's no religious moderates here, just bad and worse.

Literally the only moderate Muslims I've ever met are 2nd or 3rd generation American Muslims, and they're only moderate because they don't take their religion literally or seriously. They're moderates despite their religion, not because of it. Even Muslims in the UK are overwhelmingly conservative and zealous (there's been some recent polling on UK Muslim's views on things like gay people, and let's just say that the results were... not moderate at all).

Just because others make that same criticism it does not mean it isn’t disingenuous.

Ehh.... when enough people make the same criticism, consistently, there might actually be something to it. Sweeping all this under the rug as "disingenuous" seems dishonest and self-serving. It's like, you don't actually believe that theocratic societies genuinely seek out moderate interpretations of their holy text, right? Right? You're not that naive? Right?

→ More replies (0)

5

u/msavage960 Jan 25 '23

No need to lie.

2

u/jspangles313 Jan 25 '23

Every stupid book from thousands of years ago has "nuance" yet its the countries that have extreme Islam that's treating women like second class citizens and in this case, literally flipping a person's car for burning a stupid book.

2

u/rulzo Jan 25 '23

Your getting downvoted but I grew hardcore Christian until my 20’s and can say that this is a very common interpretation in Christian circles. Christianity isn’t even a chill religion..

1

u/TimeBrilliant9213 Jan 25 '23

You never responded. Guess it was YOU that was full of shit.

1

u/moosaev Jan 25 '23

Respond to what? This isn’t a place where an honest discussion can be had. I made multiple factual points and instead of refuting them people just ignore and shit on islam. There is no point in a discussion with you people.

-2

u/TheZombiesVagina Jan 25 '23

Stop letting them in and send the ones here back. Pretty simple to defeat radical Islam if you're not a coward and actually act.

0

u/LogMeOutScotty Jan 25 '23

How do you think those two fine Christians would have reacted had Muslims been burning the Bible instead? Because I’m willing to bet it would have been equally, if not more, violent. Religion is divisive and excuses people acting in shitty ways. Maybe they should stop letting Christians in? Just to be safe.

6

u/TheZombiesVagina Jan 25 '23

If Christians saw two Muslims burning the Bible they would've scowled and asked what this country is coming to. Christians don't behead school teachers because they think someone showed a picture of their messiah, Christians don't cause major highway accidents because someone burned their favourite book. "Equally if not more violent" You're in deep with the propaganda mill, because nowhere in the current world today do you see Christians acting even to a fraction of the extremes the Muslim world goes to.

0

u/LogMeOutScotty Jan 25 '23

“These Christians burning Qurans in Muslim areas for the express purpose of pissing off Muslims are completely reasonable human beings who would never engage in violence against Muslims!!!!!!” Tell me more.

-1

u/tipsyBerbVerb Jan 25 '23

Question, I remember hearing somewhere that either it’s the Quran or one version of the Old Testament that mistakes mary Magdalene with Mary of Nazareth do you happen to know if any that is true given your experience?

9

u/keroro1454 Jan 25 '23

The Old Testament wouldn't make any reference to Mary Magdalene, since she comes well after its authorship (She's a part of the "New" Testament, after all).

The Quran makes no reference to Mary Magdalene, and there is no reference of her in any Hadith I know of.

You may be thinking of the apocryphal gospels, although I don't recall any of them claiming Mary Magdalene to be the Mother of God. The most common "conspiracy", if you want to call it that, that is derived from the apocryphal gospels regarding Mary Magdalene is the claim that she was the wife of Jesus. However, this claim is seen as pretty weak by most biblical scholars that I'm aware of.

1

u/sophia333 Jan 25 '23

Google Elaine Pegels. She explored that conspiracy pretty well.

-1

u/cjackc Jan 25 '23

Those are far from the only two Marys in the Bible or people that could have been them but not named.

0

u/Opening_Chemistry_52 Jan 25 '23

Keep in mind this is not ment to be a defense of the Christian bible as it "has its moments" and ill be honest n that i dont know much about whats actually in the quran so i litterally just did a google search for "quran contradictions" and got 1,150,000 results in under .5 a second.

-1

u/Sawallin Jan 25 '23

Were in quran do it talk about gays? You are talking BS. Quran say nothing about gays

-12

u/phucyu140 Jan 25 '23

Radical Islam is going to be a lot harder to defeat than a lot of Westerners believe or understand.

I'm not Muslim but I've met plenty of them and I never really got a bad vibe from any of them.

5

u/duolingoupdatesucks Jan 25 '23

Tell that to the gay people being flung from rooftops for being gay. I’m sure they’ll appreciate you not "getting a bad vibe" as they plummet to their deaths.

-2

u/phucyu140 Jan 25 '23

So only Muslims attack gay people?

STFU you bigot.

1

u/duolingoupdatesucks Jan 26 '23

No, but only Muslims throw them off rooftops. Did reality hurt your feelings?

0

u/phucyu140 Jan 26 '23

No because non-Muslims throw people off of roofs as well.

WTF is your problem? Why are you such a bigot?

1

u/duolingoupdatesucks Jan 26 '23

Sure thing. Everyone everywhere throws gays off roortops, all willy nilly. That is why that is never in the news, at all.

It is not bigoted to point out facts. Islam is a hateful and evil ideology if you actually follow the Quran (which is literally the word of God, and thus not open to any interpretation). Not fun to be an infidel, a fallen Muslim, gay or a woman when that heinous book is followed.

0

u/phucyu140 Jan 26 '23

It is not bigoted to point out facts. Islam is a hateful and evil ideology if you actually follow the Quran

If you actually interacted with Muslims, you'd see that a lot of them don't hold the belief of hurting people. I've hung around plenty of Muslims and I don't remember a time when they brought up how gay people need to die.

You're a pure bigot.

1

u/duolingoupdatesucks Jan 26 '23

Then they are not following the Book of Evil🤷‍♂️

→ More replies (0)

8

u/gotBanhammered Jan 25 '23

Missing the point.

6

u/TimeBrilliant9213 Jan 25 '23

"This guy didn't get a bad vibe everyone"

I will inform all of the oppressed women and homosexual groups.

-1

u/phucyu140 Jan 25 '23

I will inform all of the oppressed women and homosexual groups.

Only Muslim oppress women and gay people?

Whatever you bigot.

-9

u/InternationalRest793 Jan 25 '23 edited Jan 25 '23

My family is Christian but as a kid I was forced to read the holy books of all three Abrahamic faiths (Old Testament, New Testament and Quran) a dozen times.

Sorry for being skeptical, but how is that possible on a childhood timeline? The OT alone can takes months to read. Tack on the NT & Quaran onto the timeline too, and how are we to easily believe that you had enough time as a kid (and also the patience, the attention span, and the reading skills to interpret the antiquated language) to go through all three twelve times before being old enough to drive?

EDIT: 10 hours later, this post is at -9 downvotes and a bunch of replies who aren't the person I'm asking trying to guess at their answer (and they never did answer, for that matter.) For downvoting someone being skeptical about a suspicious claim, the hivemind on this website is often just as rabidly unquestioning and gullible as the religious extremists themselves.

4

u/guitarguru01 Jan 25 '23

I was a big reader as a kid. I would read a whole book in a day or 2. I also grew up christian and read the Bible. It did not take me months.

3

u/XannyLarusso Jan 25 '23

It would only take months to read if you tried to break it down and study it meticulously. It's just a book.

1

u/InternationalRest793 Jan 25 '23 edited Jan 25 '23

It's "just" one of the lengthiest narrative anthology collections of all human history, with regular interruptions and contradictions and obscurities that make modern readers feel like they're hitting a brick wall every few columns.

The percentage of people on this planet who have read every canonical Abrahamic religious text cover-to-cover like OP claims has got to be less than 5%. And that tiny percentage is going to be weighed more with scholars, theology students, priests and rabbis and imams and other invested professionals who work in the religion business, certainly not children. Then multiply that by twelve and I have every reason to be skeptical about the "I read the Hebrew Bible, the Christian Bible, and the Islamic Quaran all twelve times through when I was a child" claim. By any reasonable objective standard, that is an outlier of a claim to make. I don't doubt that there may be an incredibly small minority of some genius child prodigies out there who've done it twelve times, but I do doubt that they'd also be bragging about it on reddit in the middle of the night. Also, what's the deal with "twelve?" Why that number specifically? Maybe OP went through some kind of ritualistic routine that I would appreciate learning more about?

So thanks for being really unrealistic about what a significant challenge that would be for any modern reader to go through just once, even if they were an adult. Let alone twelve times as a child.

1

u/XannyLarusso Jan 25 '23 edited Jan 25 '23

It's "just" one of the lengthiest narrative anthology collections of all human history, with regular interruptions and contradictions and obscurities that make modern readers feel like they're hitting a brick wall every few columns.

And therein lies your problem. You're viewing this entire proposed situation from the position of an (I assume) adult who is trying to deeply understand the text and what it means to you. A child likely isn't doing that and, if his family was actually forcing him to read them as he says, he's at best speeding through it and consuming it as if it were any fiction novel you'd pick up off the shelf.

Then multiply that by twelve and I have every reason to be skeptical about the "I read the Hebrew Bible, the Christian Bible, and the Islamic Quaran all twelve times through when I was a child" claim.

You seem to be fixated on the literal number associated with the term "dozen" without recognizing that many people use terms like "dozen", "several", "countless", and so on in a hyperbolic manner that means something like "a number of times more than one" as opposed to the actual number associated with the term.

This person did not read all three a dozen times each; I doubt the total number of times they read all three, combined, is even HALF a dozen. No dispute there. But I fundamentally disagree that it's a wild claim to have read all three front to back cumulatively during childhood.

Edit to address this:

So thanks for being really unrealistic about what a significant challenge that would be for any modern reader to go through just once, even if they were an adult.

Respectfully, I just think your angle is off a bit here. I think this would be harder for an adult to do because the average child lacks the understanding, education, and general life experience to really grapple with a religious text beyond the most rudimentary understanding. I doubt that they would be running into any roadblocks trying to resolve contradictions or look for meaning beyond the literal.

1

u/InternationalRest793 Jan 25 '23 edited Jan 25 '23

And your problem lies in getting weirdly defensive of someone shitting all over Islam with an argument based on an incredibly suspicious claim. But thanks for moving the goalpost to one that we both agree on:

This person did not read all three a dozen times each;

I'm not going to be 100% sure of that either way, but glad to see we both have the suspicions at least. Awesome. Still waiting on THE ACTUAL POSTER to chime in though and clarify wtf they were actually talking about. My money's betting that they were just lying for karma, with gullible "militant athiest" redditors (who don't even read the books they're so critical of (because they take so damn long)) eating the bait the whole way.

Being forced by out-of-touch parents to read complicated books above their age level twelve times over, and then coming to some sort of enlightenment for how smart they became because of it, is a story that reads vividly like a militant atheist redditor fantasy.

2

u/cjackc Jan 25 '23

It might not mean read in their entirety and dozen might be an exaggeration and not exactly 12.

2

u/Theesismyphoneacc Jan 25 '23

I read the lord of the rings series like three times before I was 11. That was along with a shit ton of other books

1

u/InternationalRest793 Jan 25 '23 edited Jan 25 '23

Awesome. Lord of the Rings is about half the length of the Bible, was written in modern English to entertain a commercial audience at a teenager's reading level, and doesn't require a background knowledge of 3,000 years of history & politics to even be readable.

As exhaustive and detailed as LotR lore is, any fictional worldbuilding that just one human conjures up in a couple decades through their lifetime is going to be just crumbs compared to how complex IRL history is. LotR was made partially out of a sense of envy of just how much mythology Tolkien felt the Mediterranean world had compared to North Europe (though Celtic & Norse & Germanic mythologies are all exhaustive enough that I've always felt that envy of his was up for debate. He wasn't exactly writing in a time where Vikings were considered a source of cool adventurous fantasies.)

Religious texts blur the line between "fiction" and "nonfiction," as they were written in times where verifying truth from fact was much more difficult. Consider that much of The Bible is not for storytelling at all. A lot of it is just receipts, and how are we to expect those sections to keep a kid entertained on their cover-to-cover reading? Twelves times over, at that? Reading Lord of the Rings cover-to-cover is sooooo much easier than a single read-through of the Bible.

Sure, Tolkien can get awfully winded for a couple pages droning out some lengthy descriptions of trees and songs and food, but I do not recall Lord of the Rings feeling like a mythology-world newspaper (or courthouse record book) like the Bible often does. It never assumes the mantle of non-fiction. I do not recall LotR going on for four pages at a time describing land sales records, verbatim copies of their society's entire law codes, genealogy records of every single tribal family involved, no big construction manuals on how to build buildings, no farmer's almanac advice stuff about how to raise sheep. It's so much more dryer, denser, so many more legal records that kids are going to find boring, the list goes on...

1

u/Theesismyphoneacc Jan 26 '23

🤓

(Sorry you did this to yourself)

1

u/InternationalRest793 Jan 26 '23

👍

1

u/Theesismyphoneacc Jan 26 '23

But anyways I was also reading like 75-100 books a year. I read dune when I was 9-10 (the sequels were too much at the time though lol)

→ More replies (0)

1

u/KmartQuality Jan 25 '23

What should we do?

1

u/enlightened-badass Jan 25 '23

I believe all these religious books were written by humans as a means of oppression and trying to control by fear. I was raised Christian but no longer believe. Although I do believe in a higher power - but that is a personal choice and personal relationship.

1

u/Stalysfa Jan 26 '23

The reason there is much more chill in Christianity is simply because secular powers have consistently throughout history tried to diminish the power of religion.

The different kings of France and holy Roman emperors had their fair share of fight against religious power. French Revolution really broke papacy power.

The rise of the nation state replaced the church’s role in the administrative affairs of the village. Marriage, education, birth certificate, everything was done by Christian’s.

There have been many attempts to resist secular powers by religious powers. They were just met by stronger forces. There is a reason the French Republic sent gendarmes with axes to force open churches.

I don’t believe a single second that there is an objective and inherent reason as to why Christianity would be more chill. I mean, there have been institutionalized Christian organizations that have done horrible things.

8

u/Romas_chicken Jan 25 '23

Jokes on them…there is no heaven.

They’re just wasting their lives for superstition and lies

2

u/tuenthe463 Jan 25 '23

Imagine thinking there's a heaven

1

u/naushad2982 Jan 25 '23

Probably not as bad as thinking that God told you to attack Iraq, kill and maim millions all over fabricated lies.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2005/oct/07/iraq.usa

1

u/SarpedonWasFramed Jan 25 '23

Pretty sure every religions main point is to be good to other humans. Yet so many religious people think their God them to go to war and kill in his name

1

u/FU_IamGrutch Jan 25 '23

Bush doesn’t believe in God, he just said that to get all the dummies to follow his schemes.

0

u/naushad2982 Jan 25 '23

Told you himself did he? Cause he told the reporter something totally opposite of your statement........

1

u/[deleted] Jan 25 '23

They can’t think that way because islam teaches its haram to hurt other people or damage their posessions by purpose or risk other peoples lives. These people have anger issues.

1

u/SarpedonWasFramed Jan 25 '23

Everyone involved in this sucks.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 26 '23

I agree

1

u/Stackfest Jan 25 '23

Er quite possibly in their eyes ? Hence the video

1

u/PAKKiMKB Jan 25 '23

you won't find mohammad in heaven. Dante found him in one of the seven circles :)